Should I Invest Lyft IPO or Uber IPO in 2019, UBER Ready For Uber IPO 2019

Ridesharing giant Uber has a major potential for further growth and already has a well-established name in the industry of ridesharing, which could make it one of the top initial public offerings by far despite the fact that Uber is considered to be challenged by a smaller, but an equally promising company, Lyft.

Uber decided to launch their IPO in 2019 as the board of directors at the company agreed that the time has come for Uber to become a publicly traded company, alongside the fact that Uber has become the second name for ridesharing.

Although challenged by another upcoming IPO issued by its main competitor, Lyft, the company that is preparing to go live already on March 30th, 2019, Uber is considered to be close to finishing all preparations for their own IPO with a great possibility that the company will go public already in the first half of 2019.

The prominent ridesharing startup already has promising investors such as Jeff Bezos from Amazon, SoftBank, Toyota Motor Company, Tencent Music, Fidelity Investments as well as other companies and individual major investors.

Uber IPO Could Be the Greatest Public Offering

Uber is not as impatiently anticipated in vain, as the ridesharing giant is said to have a major opportunity to become one of the biggest public offerings that the market had ever seen.

This is the case because the company is already valued at 120 billion dollars after announcing their IPO, while the estimated value exceeds the previous evaluation by 50 billion dollars. With these estimates, also confirmed by JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, Uber could surpass Facebook IPO of 104 billion dollars back in 2012 when the company went public and also Google’s IPO valued at 23 billion dollars back in 2004 when Google decided to become a publicly traded company.

Should I Invest Lyft IPO or Uber IPO in 2019?

The big debate amongst IPO investors right now is whether they prefer Uber or Lyft. Both companies might appear to offer practically the same services, but when you get into the details things become less clear.

Lyft is technically a “unicorn” with a valuation at over $1 billion, and Friday’s IPO included a lot of interesting information. Utilizing these new stats and some existing information, here are five big reasons why Lyft is a significant threat to Uber. According to CCN News, we prepared “5 Biggest Reasons to Choose Lyft IPO Over Uber in 2019”. Let’s have a look at it.


The principal difference between Uber and Lyft is size. While Uber is in nearly 70 nations worldwide, Lyft is only in the United States with around 300 cities running their services. Some might think that Uber is the superior investment because of its size, but that is not the case. With greater size can come greater expenses and increased operating risks. While Uber has faced (and continues) to meet a regulatory firestorm, Lyft’s sole presence in the US has allowed it to avoid most of the trouble that’s Uber has gotten itself in. Like a younger child watching an older sibling, Lyft has been able to learn from Uber’s mistakes. Yes, Lyft is making a loss just like Uber. reported:

Lyft recorded $2.2 billion in revenue in 2018, more than double the $1 billion recorded in 2017. Meanwhile, losses have been growing considerably. The company posted a net loss of $911 million on the $2.2 billion in revenue and a $688 million loss on 2017’s $1 billion.

The leaner your business model, the easier it can be to avoid complicated set-backs. By focusing on the US, Lyft ensures that it only has to deal with a (mostly) business-friendly environment that champions investment. You can not say the same for Uber.


Let’s be honest; everyone’s biggest hang-ups over using a ridesharing service are safety. All you want is to get where you are going safely and efficiently. Both Uber and Lyft have made it their top priority. Clearly, in the early days when Uber dominated the landscape, it was the obvious choice. But as Lyft eats into Uber’s market share, it becomes more and more apparent that the consumers are legitimizing its smaller competitor.

By filing for an IPO, Lyft has been given an incredible amount of publicity with people regularly comparing it with Uber. Before the IPO talk, I barely considered Lyft at all, but Uber’s monopoly in my life is over. In a business where consumer confidence is king, being able to identify as a publicly traded company is worth its weight in gold.


As a frequent user of rideshare services in Los Angeles, one of the key concerns I have faced is driver availability. No-one wants to stand on the side of the ride for 20 minutes in the rain only for the driver to cancel at the last minute with no other cars in sight. I have asked many drivers why they drive for the Company they do, and the answer is nearly always the same, that they couldn’t care less if its Lyft or Uber as they use both simultaneously. The point is that Lyft has successfully matched Uber’s payment and cost model for all but minor differences. Keeping drivers happy is huge for Lyft. Having enough active cars is a big challenge for a smaller, less well-known brand with fewer clients.

More drivers increase the number of riders, and Lyft can continue to effectively scale the number of cars on the road so long as drivers see a benefit in running both apps.


One of the big selling points for Uber is that an investment in their IPO is more than investing in rideshare technology. It is also investing in Uber Eats and the more tantalizing driverless car technology. Lyft is also investing in driverless technology. They are matching Uber step for step into any progressive ideas for Urban transportation. While we can’t know who will have the most success with driver-less technology, Lyft is also a player. Its US-centric policy might help it to get cars regulated and on the road faster than Uber who will be dealing with multiple different regulatory bodies.


People talk a lot about momentum in financial markets, and often it is entirely subjective. Just because something grew X amount last month doesn’t mean it will continue. It is often worth considering these trends however because they can offer some insight into consumer behavior. As you can see from this picture, Lyft has substantially eaten into Uber’s market share over the last few years. Focusing our attention on individual cities shows even more interesting statistics, as in Seattle Lyft is not far off 50%.

If Lyft can concentrate on the major US cities and achieve comparable market share down the road, then it could offer investors a more stable business model than Uber. Uber’s reliance on a sheer scale would make it more vulnerable to shifts in global market conditions. As Dan Sperling said to a while back,

“The only advantage of going international is just to be bigger, I think it’s absolutely sensible to stay focused on the U.S. market. It does mean it will be a smaller company, but the profitability will be just as much.”

It could also face arbitrary decisions by foreign governments that domestic investors might not see coming.


While everyone wants to lump these two companies together, from an investing standpoint, perhaps that is the wrong approach. Yes, they offer the same services, but it is their independent ambition that they differ. Uber is a grand vision for global monopoly, while Lyft seeks to dominate domestically. For this reason, despite Lyft’s smaller scale, it might be the safer play. This is not to say that LYFT does not have its problems with slowing revenue and debt, but rather that with a history of scandals, Uber has more drivers, more riders – and more problems.

Find All Lulu Stock, Zoom Stock, Uber Lyft, Casper IPO, Yeti Stock, Lyft IPO, Uber IPO, IPO Stock News in TheOofy.Com.

Disclaimer: The information on this site is provided for discussion purposes only, and should not be misconstrued as investment advice. Under no circumstances does this information represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities.